jibbby
New Member
- Messages
- 3,824
- Location
- Santa Monica, California
Your 0-60 times will blast off but your quarter mile gains will not be that dramatic...Exhaust and T.C. will make your car come to life......
wat bout 95 vs something more recent?WDoherty said:sinai, as far as deciding what year. i think you said a 92 or 95, would go a 95. the earlier sc's dyno around 180rwhp and the 95-97 dyno 200rwhp due to higher compresion 10.4, and a slightly more aggresive ehaust cam (i think), they also have sequential injection compared to the earlier batch firing.
so all i would be missin out on is vvti? then if thats the case i would be more than satisfied wit a 95..WDoherty said:well, the 98 up is goin to cost you quite abit more, but will have better low-end punch due to vvt-i and a 5 speed transmission so better mpg as well. It depends on budget. But if you are going FI you might be better with a non-vvti motor is all depends if you are going to remain mostly stock or go FI.
then im good, im sure later down the line i can get that tranny in my 95 or so rite?WDoherty said:vvti and a 5 speed auto vs. a 4 speed
the thing is, if are a novice at building motors....u mite not see this....UZZ30-Québec said:If i could have bought a VVTI, I would have.
300HP, 310torque, 5 speed... these things must be considerated.
i see u feel strongly bout this,UZZ30-Québec said:putting an exausth won't make your car have a flat torque curve like VVT-I does
putting an exausth won't make your car smog legal in some area (unless you were thinking that you can gain 30HP without headders???)
putting an exausth won't give you the 5 speed trans.
by all means, if i could get that 99 or 2000 i would, well i dunno, if i actually had that kinda money....UZZ30-Québec said:yes they are 10g's more, but they are in better shape also. in 4-5 years, they'll be the same price as a 95 today. But i understand what you mean.