vvega said:
Boundary Layer Theory, by Schlichting, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1960
go to your local libary and get it out if not there your local university
Thank you for referencing a solid source, but 1960? That's pretty old, don't you think? If everyone thought like you guys, then we'd never even have the wheel, we'd all be footing it everywhere. "No need to re-invent the wheel, let's just use what we've got already."
vvega said:
ask yourself this
i you came to my class and i told your the theroy surrounding this would you still think i was arogant or would you just listen and tri to understand and then do your own footwork to help you get a backround
I don't understand what you are trying to say. Literally. This is the part where spelling, punctuation, and grammar come into play. If you can't get your ideas across to someone then they'll never get it.
vvega said:
just as a matter of intrest for you
jet impingement is a method of cooling cores in a emergency
the point of this method id to overcome the problems of boundry layers(in water)
they are a big part of fluid dynamics and as "air" has the same propertys as a fluid when velocity is introduced
Are you talking about reactor cores? While my experience is with only TWO SPECIFIC cores, I've never heard anything about jet impingement. As I said though, I've only worked with 2 specific cores, so it's very possible, and quite probable, that I have just never been exposed to it.
Of course air has the same properties as a "fluid," it IS a fluid. Though air tends to do some funky things when it gets supersonic; I'm not sure if water would do the same.
vvega said:
i can give you books to read to help you but tuners secrets are not somthing that is normally shared ...it is the reason that people pay for this kind of work and most are quite tight lipped about these things
There are plenty of people out there who've found what works and are willing to share. I agree that these people are in a very small minority, but in my experience, every circle has it's own innovator(s) who is willing to share the knowledge for the benefit of everyone.
vvega said:
I had forgotten about SAE documents. I really should have searched into the subject a bit. But it's obvious to me that your reading is as bad as your spelling. As I said before, I was simply thinking out loud. The reason I didn't "do this myself" is because I'm not the one spreading words as fact. That's why I asked you to. It's not MY burden to support YOUR ideas with proof.
Another reason why I asked is because for the other people who don't know how to find it, now they can also figure it out for themselves.
vvega said:
ps grammer and spelling is no way to judge somones intelect that is why you will find no such questions in a IQ test
Tests in general are a **** way to test intelligence. But when it comes to forums such as this, there are people who can accurately get their words across and there are people who cannot. Typically, the ones who can't be bothered to put effort into their typing are also the ones who can't be bothered to put actual facts into their statements. Sorry, but I'm automatically assuming that a person who can type in complete sentences and spell correctly is automatically more knowledgable than someone who can barely type an incomplete thought. As you alluded to before, there's a lot of crap out there on the internet, and you can't believe everything, so the only way is to weed out the crap posts from the intelligent ones. And I have to say, it's worked GREAT for me so far.
vvega said:
im not attacking i just have very limited patiance (sorry if i have come across that way)
but that is a small price to pay for good free information
v
I hope I don't come off as attacking either. Really, I just like to share ideas. I guess I just felt that you were assuming I was stating something as fact when I was merely thinking out loud... which is totally understandable, given the current state of forums and people's tendency to do this. I apologize if I mistakenly worded something to the effect that incorrect information was posed as a fact.
Too often, when discussing technical matters, conversation degrades into bickering. This was not my intention, and I apologize for provoking it. I get defensive quite easily. But don't let that stop you from correcting me! Even if I do believe what I say is fact, if I'm wrong then I want to know. It doesn't do ANYONE any good if BAD info is spread as fact.
Anyway, sorry about all this and I hope we can keep the discussion going. Thanks for the links. Sometimes I have total brain farts and can't remember where to look for stuff.
