- Messages
- 5,631
- Location
- Sydney, Australia
I found some interesting figures on the capacity of the 1UZ-FE cylinder head to flow air.
An article in an old Auto Speed described how Flow Testing is done and why. Interestingly they chose a 1UZ-FE cylinder head to use as an example of before and after flow figures.
According to the article the following flows were obtained using a standard unmodified head. All figures are in cubic feet per minute (CFM).
(Sorry the below table doesn't display too well the spacing goes whacky when I submit the thread. I hope you follow what's happening)
Lift (in thou of an inch) Intake exhaust Increase
50 24.2 18.4
100 51 36.3 97.28%
150 77.1 57.2 57.60%
200 96 66.4 16.08%
250 113 74.1 11.16%
300 121 81.7 10.26%
350 124 86.9 6.36%
Intersetingly the law of diminishing returns has kicked in at 300thou. Increasing lift to 400thou shouldn't give any more than 4% increase which isn't much given the additional strain on the valve train and the fact the engine may encounter interference.
Following some port work the head flowed 147 on the intake and 94 on the exhaust. The article doesn’t say at what lift the “after” flow was measured at but a photograph of the head shows the figures were compared to the unported 350thou figures. The photo shows the head with the four figures written on adjacent cylinders.
This suggests the porting gained 18.5% on the inlet and 10.8% on the exhaust. Pity the exhaust didn’t gain a bit more.
I would think 18% on the inlet and 10% on the exhaust side combined with a decent set of headers and a well thought out exhaust (JBrady style) should deliver a fairly substantial increase in HP. Last time I checked the cost of porting was around Aussie $1,200.00.
Has anyone done any back to back dyno runs without/with porting? Or has anyone done any flow testing to see what is happening or what we can gain.
An article in an old Auto Speed described how Flow Testing is done and why. Interestingly they chose a 1UZ-FE cylinder head to use as an example of before and after flow figures.
According to the article the following flows were obtained using a standard unmodified head. All figures are in cubic feet per minute (CFM).
(Sorry the below table doesn't display too well the spacing goes whacky when I submit the thread. I hope you follow what's happening)
Lift (in thou of an inch) Intake exhaust Increase
50 24.2 18.4
100 51 36.3 97.28%
150 77.1 57.2 57.60%
200 96 66.4 16.08%
250 113 74.1 11.16%
300 121 81.7 10.26%
350 124 86.9 6.36%
Intersetingly the law of diminishing returns has kicked in at 300thou. Increasing lift to 400thou shouldn't give any more than 4% increase which isn't much given the additional strain on the valve train and the fact the engine may encounter interference.
Following some port work the head flowed 147 on the intake and 94 on the exhaust. The article doesn’t say at what lift the “after” flow was measured at but a photograph of the head shows the figures were compared to the unported 350thou figures. The photo shows the head with the four figures written on adjacent cylinders.
This suggests the porting gained 18.5% on the inlet and 10.8% on the exhaust. Pity the exhaust didn’t gain a bit more.
I would think 18% on the inlet and 10% on the exhaust side combined with a decent set of headers and a well thought out exhaust (JBrady style) should deliver a fairly substantial increase in HP. Last time I checked the cost of porting was around Aussie $1,200.00.
Has anyone done any back to back dyno runs without/with porting? Or has anyone done any flow testing to see what is happening or what we can gain.