Which would you drive?

[Toysrme]

No, I'm talking about the AMG bi-turbo engine.
604bhp @ 4800, 738ft-lbs @ 2000-4000
You're asking an extra 100bhp per turbo. That's not exactly stretching anything LoL!

Remember the golden rule of making power, "It's always easyest to make power when it comes with boost".





Never driven, or ridden in a viper. Never intend too after watching about every review of one sliding around everywhere & spinning out constantly. I already have a car that spins out *every* time, uncontrollably, and perfectly when it's on the limit; it's called FWD with a massive rear sway bar. LoL!

Besides, I have something crittically against what is basically a poorly consturcted kit car.
Give me the money, I can make something better LoL!

 

[Toysrme]

btw, the AGM 65 has the bi- turbo, not the old N/A v12. As far as I know - I don't keep up with expencive cars much.

Regardless, the thread was on the AMG 65 - which has the bi-turbo v12.

 

[turbosix]

lyndsay lohan has one.. automatically makes it a girl car.. hwa!

 

[Lewis]

Don't believe everything you read in those magazine
Lewis

 

[turbosix]

Don't believe everything you read in those magazine
Lewis

who are you referring to?

 

[jibbby]

Did you know the newest "2007 Porsche 911 turbo (twin)" has no lag time at all on the turbo's.....They have designed opening vavles on the exhaust that maintains minumum boost to keeps the turbo's active.. I repeat no LAG what so ever - What does that mean?

2007 911 twin - Automatic 0-60MPH 3.4 Seconds
Manual 0-60MPH 3.7 Seconds

Apparently it takes more time to shift manually...Wow!!!!

 

[WDoherty]

it means its bad as hell. look for my old post regarding it. its called a variable vane turbo. I'd like to see a new zo6 and 911 go at it 0-60, the 911 should spank it.

 

[stevechumo]

it means its bad as hell. look for my old post regarding it. its called a variable vane turbo. I'd like to see a new zo6 and 911 go at it 0-60, the 911 should spank it.

Both of them are my preference. I read somewhere that some hi-performance companies already have some supercharger systems for the Z06 that can make around 700 hp. With this number, the 911 has to watch out.

 

[WDoherty]

oh maybe i'm too wasted to respond, but ruf will also get its hand on the porsche so well see.

 

[UZZ30-Québec]

You guys forgot one thing.

To put the Buggati Veyron in the topic.

This, is the only car that i'd take over the Vanquish.

1001HP, and it goes like a rocket.

Z06, Vanquish, 911 and all these little babies can go back to nursery when it's time to face that veyron.

 

[Lewis]

Turbosix, I'm just refering to Car And Driver, since it was mentioned.

 

[turbosix]

You guys forgot one thing.

To put the Buggati Veyron in the topic.

This, is the only car that i'd take over the Vanquish.

1001HP, and it goes like a rocket.

Z06, Vanquish, 911 and all these little babies can go back to nursery when it's time to face that veyron.

veyron? psh.. what a joke...

806hp . 2600lbs

veyron doesnt have **** on this :slaphappy

 

[jibbby]

I didn't put the Mclaren N1 and the Bugatti Veyron on the list because they are not the peoples car and drivers choice for top end sports cars...I think the million + dollar prices have something to do with that...

Bugattiei Veyron - The worlds fastest production made car
retail price - $1,250,000-$1,750,000 (crazy)

specs-

Has a quad turbo charged 16 cylinder engine

- 1001 horsepower
- 0-62mph in 2.5 seconds
- Top speed 253mph

 

[turbosix]

http://www.koenigsegg.se/movies/koenigsegg_topgear.wmv

they have not tested the top speed of the CCX yet, should go around 250 as well, but this car can actually go around a track

 

[UZZ30-Québec]

veyron? psh.. what a joke...

806hp . 2600lbs

veyron doesnt have **** on this :slaphappy

Veyron is AWD! 2.5 secs 0-100km/h

but yeah, the ccx is an amazing car, but i'd still take the veyron. More exclusive, more luxury, more sex appeal. more everything.

And, i don't even want to mention "how 'bout adding a boost controller?" :bigeyes: :bigeyes: :bigeyes:

 

[turbosix]

Veyron is AWD! 2.5 secs 0-100km/h

but yeah, the ccx is an amazing car, but i'd still take the veyron. More exclusive, more luxury, more sex appeal. more everything.

And, i don't even want to mention "how 'bout adding a boost controller?" :bigeyes: :bigeyes: :bigeyes:

not a fan of AWD, its a crutch.

the ccx is much more exclusive than the veyron as they have produced only a few

more luxury? thats pretty objective, as is sex appeal and "everything"

unless you're talking about weight, which i'll agree.

 

[rivmasta]

I drove a Paganini Zonda here in Sydney... for about 20m... actually, it was prob closer to 10m. And only inthe warehouse its stored in. And then I got scared and got out.

I couldnt get my foot off the clutch - my knee didnt fit between the wheel and hte gearstick.

Just not built for a guy who is 6'3".

Off the list my fav is the shelby. Ultimate fantasy to own is an '05 F150 Lightning Harley Davidson.

 

[Lextreme II]

My ultimate fantasy would be driving a 1000 rwhp SC400 with TH400 transmission. Twin GT35R turbos with 2uzfe bottom and 1uzfe heads. Autronic standalone ECU. This fantasy can be done with about 25k. It might not get the looks or the wow, but once the turbos spooled up. Its over!

 

[jun]

Porsche anytime!!!!!!!!!! I like the feel it gives and not the ones with plush leather with so much options. I like the simplicity and the true feeling of a super car

 

[Toysrme]

F150's suck. Horribly. I know, I've got one. Worst trucks on the road.
Horrific build quality.