you've miss-read my post....400ZED said:Back to Back dyno runs are not useless at all done on the same dyno even if it is not a acurate dyno it will give results relative to a previouse run. telling of improvements asross the rev range FAR FROM USELESS.
"apart from tuning OR back to back tests dyno's are useless anyway."
i said they are only good for back to back tests or tuning.
my point is there is no point comparing one car on one dyno to another car on another dyno...as all dyno results vary.
well a quarter mile.... think about it..... you're only flooring it for 10-20 secs depending on car. that's all that you're ever going to do on the street.400ZED said:1/4 times have their downside as welldiff ratios and weight and suspension setups not everyone or many people want to drive a car setup for 0-400 meters never the most practical thing
Dynos are irriplacable although peak power is only the tip of the information gathered from a properley run dyno.it is about area and torque curves and smooth curves not just peak.
i think it's a great benchmark for how a car will perform on the street.
also, if you're ever out cruising the street and come across some1 to race, what type of race is it gonna be at the next set of lights??
straight drag.

but i'm not saying a quarter mile run will give a 100% true indication of how a car performs on the street. obviously handling is not taken into the equation.
i'm just saying its about 3 times more accurate than results from a dyno.
dyno's don't cater for diff ratios, suspension setup, car weight. (which should be a MAJOR FACTOR when dealing with this engine considering all the cars that came with it from factory are fat-dogs!

look at my truck example again.
