rivmasta
New Member
Hypothetically... to get a 1UZ down to 3.5 Ltr would require changes to either stroke, bore or both. Im looking to find the best balance between budget and performance for this hypothetical engine.
Hypothetical engine would be <3500cc, absolutely no chance of FI, built for torque instead of HP (offroad racecar), be built to the cheapest form I can do it in.
currently:
bore = 87.5mm
Stroke = 82.5mm
Capacity = 3969.4cc
rod lgth = 147mm
Bore/Stroke ratio: 1.061
Rod/Stroke ratio: 1.770
option 1, Bore Only:
bore drops 5.5mm to 82mm
Capacity to 3486.1cc
Bore/Stroke to 0.994
costs: Sleeves, Pistons, rings, pins, machining.
what are disadvantages/advantages of that bore/stroke ratio?
Option 2, Stroke Only:
Stroke drops 10mm to 72.5
Capacity drops 3488.3
Rod Length increases 10mm to 157mm ***EDIT - should this be increase by 5mm?***
Bore/Stroke to 1.207
Rod/Stroke to 2.014
Costs: Custom crank (or can you regrind 10mm off? Naaa - didnt think so!), custom rods.
What advantages/disadvantages would thais have over doing bore only?
Option 3 would have been both... cant afford that though! (hypothetically of course!)
Would the standard sized valves, runners, manifolds etc suit a 3.5Ltr or would it all be too large losing any advantage over my opposition I may have?
Just out of interest..... probably.
Hypothetical engine would be <3500cc, absolutely no chance of FI, built for torque instead of HP (offroad racecar), be built to the cheapest form I can do it in.
currently:
bore = 87.5mm
Stroke = 82.5mm
Capacity = 3969.4cc
rod lgth = 147mm
Bore/Stroke ratio: 1.061
Rod/Stroke ratio: 1.770
option 1, Bore Only:
bore drops 5.5mm to 82mm
Capacity to 3486.1cc
Bore/Stroke to 0.994
costs: Sleeves, Pistons, rings, pins, machining.
what are disadvantages/advantages of that bore/stroke ratio?
Option 2, Stroke Only:
Stroke drops 10mm to 72.5
Capacity drops 3488.3
Rod Length increases 10mm to 157mm ***EDIT - should this be increase by 5mm?***
Bore/Stroke to 1.207
Rod/Stroke to 2.014
Costs: Custom crank (or can you regrind 10mm off? Naaa - didnt think so!), custom rods.
What advantages/disadvantages would thais have over doing bore only?
Option 3 would have been both... cant afford that though! (hypothetically of course!)
Would the standard sized valves, runners, manifolds etc suit a 3.5Ltr or would it all be too large losing any advantage over my opposition I may have?
Just out of interest..... probably.