Search results

I am looking for a place to get a core for a custom water/air intercooler but I have no idea where to get one. Only think I have found are complete kits including manifold. I just need the core.

BTW, where do I pick up one of these intake/TB setups? Or is this fully custom. I haven't been able to find anything else like it for the lighting m112.

hmm, wonder how much just the snout is. You going to fit that with an intercooler? I am thinking about it for mine, but I would probably need to add 2" to the setup. :(

I am using a ford lightning m112, althoughI wouldn't mind getting a longer snout to move it back a little for better balance on airflow. The mustang m112, I found to be a little too long for my liking.

I need a few bellhousings. Preferablly the solid flanges, but any will do. Price I will pay is $30+shipping

here we go. Got about 3 hours into this so far and looking good. My last setup I think I had 30 hours into and I was totally bummed about the M90 performance. This setup puts the pullet about 1" higher than my M90, but the back will be a little lower since I no longer have the water/air...

depends. I have had many failures on creating an economical replicable, custom parts and so now, when I make a prototype, I really concentrate on the design for easier duplication. This one could be rather simple, but we will see. The richmond and others are nice, but sure are pricey. Plus I...

I will flow test both and see. The smallest part of the manifold is the mating surface to the head. On my setup, I made a custom manifold, but mainly to retain a radiused inlet. I took mine to 8,000rpm on a daily basis. I don't think my manifold will flow much better than the stock...

sounds about right. I did 305rwhp and 350ft/lbs with my M90, with a 50shot of nitrous. I am heading to the metal shop to go pick up some 1/2" aluminum plate to start working on my M112 manifold. My M90 already sticks out of the hood, so don't really care if the M112 will. But the manifold I...

I would say 7500, that is well within limits of the stock internals. These motors have a shorter stroke than a 2J and can easily take it. I reved mine to 8K on daily basis, until the 170,000 miles auto didn't want to shift. Working on R154 conversion right now, and thinking about some...

problem with M90 is that you have to get the smallest pully to make 6-7psi, and that will take the M90 past its effciency range. Only going to make 50hp over stock. And the little M90 won't make a dent of difference against that Cheyenne. Even the M112 may not get you there. Problem is...

Made a mistaked this morning on the flow numbers. I left the spark plug out. Anyway, updated with the proper numbers. Still impressive. I also did a quick cleanup, and needless to say, Toyota did a dang good job, because I didn't gain much. In fact I lost just a tiny bit on the low lift...

Slapped the head on the bench this morning and got a nice surprise. I knew they would flow well, but they did a little better than my estimate. I guess at .5" of lift, the heads would flow just under 300, I was going to say 298. I was a little on the low side. Here they are: .100"...

I think I would just stick to an AEM. Can control engine and trans.

couldn't you do a missing tooth trigger off the crank plate on the rear of the motor? I thought about that too, and not use the cam trigger since the vvti would screw all that up.

ok, that is confusing. What EMS's are you running and how are you working the VVTI. Do you have a writeup on what you did?

being a 2003, your tach probably works?(toyota made changes to tach signal starting in 2003 I think). I am having an issue trying to get a tach signal on my 2005 2uz. I have got an inductive tach adapter, but it is 1 single per cycle. Other than a motorcycle tach, I haven't been able to find...

haha, couple = 2...usually. What did you use it for?

2K for a complete setup with trans...that is pretty darn good as well.