How to make exhaust louder without loosing low end torque

The 1UZFE EGR Delete Kit is available for sale here.

Gsean400

New Member
Messages
9
Location
Phoenix
On my old 98 gs400 i went with a straight piped cat back exhaust. No mufflers or resonators. However... I lost ALOT of torque. It was almost to the point where i thought i wouldnt be able to squeel my tires from a stop. It was depressing. But i loved the sound! Everyone said it sounded like a race car. It was anywhere between 2.25 or 2.5 inch piping i forgot cause this was 4 years ago. I am running no mufflers on my gs430 and tomarrow i am getting the resonators removed. How can i avoid the power loss. I am flat broke cause i just bought a vortech v2 and cant afford mufflers. And i dont want to get cheap ones i want to get borla xr1 race mufflers sometime in the future. I also plan on installing an apexi neo on the car for the supercharger install. Im not someone who is super experienced with building engines but i love loud fast cars. So i really dont know why i would loose power from straight pipes. I know back pressure plays a part but i know someone who had a 3 inch straight piped cat bak on his gs4 and didnt lose any power. Also would it sound wierd if i removed just one of my resonators? I need your guyss help


Old exhaust

seansexhaust.jpg


seansoutsideexhaust.jpg
 
Last edited:
I assume that you've found some top end power at the expense of low rpm power. It's likely that your exhaust pipe diameter is too large.

Here's a useful discussion I once read:

Backpressure: The myth and why it's wrong.

I. Introduction

One of the most misunderstood concepts in exhaust theory is backpressure. People love to talk about backpressure on message boards with no real understanding of what it is and what it's consequences are. I'm sure many of you have heard or read the phrase "Hondas need backpressure" when discussing exhaust upgrades. That phrase is in fact completely inaccurate and a wholly misguided notion.

II. Some basic exhaust theory

Your exhaust system is designed to evacuate gases from the combustion chamber quickly and efficently. Exhaust gases are not produced in a smooth stream; exhaust gases originate in pulses. A 4 cylinder motor will have 4 distinct pulses per complete engine cycle, a 6 cylinder has 6 pules and so on. The more pulses that are produced, the more continuous the exhaust flow. Backpressure can be loosely defined as the resistance to positive flow - in this case, the resistance to positive flow of the exhaust stream.

III. Backpressure and velocity

Some people operate under the misguided notion that wider pipes are more effective at clearing the combustion chamber than narrower pipes. It's not hard to see how this misconception is appealing - wider pipes have the capability to flow more than narrower pipes. So if they have the ability to flow more, why isn't "wider is better" a good rule of thumb for exhaust upgrading? In a word - VELOCITY. I'm sure that all of you have at one time used a garden hose w/o a spray nozzle on it. If you let the water just run unrestricted out of the house it flows at a rather slow rate. However, if you take your finger and cover part of the opening, the water will flow out at a much much faster rate.

The astute exhaust designer knows that you must balance flow capacity with velocity. You want the exhaust gases to exit the chamber and speed along at the highest velocity possible - you want a FAST exhaust stream. If you have two exhaust pulses of equal volume, one in a 2" pipe and one in a 3" pipe, the pulse in the 2" pipe will be traveling considerably FASTER than the pulse in the 3" pipe. While it is true that the narrower the pipe, the higher the velocity of the exiting gases, you want make sure the pipe is wide enough so that there is as little backpressure as possible while maintaining suitable exhaust gas velocity. Backpressure in it's most extreme form can lead to reversion of the exhaust stream - that is to say the exhaust flows backwards, which is not good. The trick is to have a pipe that that is as narrow as possible while having as close to zero backpressure as possible at the RPM range you want your power band to be located at. Exhaust pipe diameters are best suited to a particular RPM range. A smaller pipe diameter will produce higher exhaust velocities at a lower RPM but create unacceptably high amounts of backpressure at high rpm. Thus if your powerband is located 2-3000 RPM you'd want a narrower pipe than if your powerband is located at 8-9000RPM.

Many engineers try to work around the RPM specific nature of pipe diameters by using setups that are capable of creating a similar effect as a change in pipe diameter on the fly. The most advanced is Ferrari's which consists of two exhaust paths after the header - at low RPM only one path is open to maintain exhaust velocity, but as RPM climbs and exhaust volume increases, the second path is opened to curb backpressure - since there is greater exhaust volume there is no loss in flow velocity. BMW and Nissan use a simpler and less effective method - there is a single exhaust path to the muffler; the muffler has two paths; one path is closed at low RPM but both are open at high RPM.

IV. So how did this myth come to be?

I often wonder how the myth "Hondas need backpressure" came to be. Mostly I believe it is a misunderstanding of what is going on with the exhaust stream as pipe diameters change. For instance, someone with a civic decides he's going to uprade his exhaust with a 3" diameter piping. Once it's installed the owner notices that he seems to have lost a good bit of power throughout the powerband. He makes the connections in the following manner: "My wider exhaust eliminated all backpressure but I lost power, therefore the motor must need some backpressure in order to make power." What he did not realize is that he killed off all his flow velocity by using such a ridiculously wide pipe. It would have been possible for him to achieve close to zero backpressure with a much narrower pipe - in that way he would not have lost all his flow velocity.

V. So why is exhaust velocity so important?

The faster an exhaust pulse moves, the better it can scavenge out all of the spent gasses during valve overlap. The guiding principles of exhaust pulse scavenging are a bit beyond the scope of this doc but the general idea is a fast moving pulse creates a low pressure area behind it. This low pressure area acts as a vacuum and draws along the air behind it. A similar example would be a vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed on a dusty road. There is a low pressure area immediately behind the moving vehicle - dust particles get sucked into this low pressure area causing it to collect on the back of the vehicle. This effect is most noticeable on vans and hatchbacks which tend to create large trailing low pressure areas - giving rise to the numerous "wash me please" messages written in the thickly collected dust on the rear door(s).

VI. Conclusion.

SO it turns out that Hondas don't need backpressure, they need as high a flow velocity as possible with as little backpressure as possible.
 
My experience with our desert racing 1UZ is different. On removing the exhausts, leaving just the stock Crown headers on we seemed to have gained a fair bit of torque throughout the rev range (not sure of sub 1000 rpm though) but tires sqeeled more and car pulled better on the sand. The exhausts were not stock (very quiet local fabricated ones) but could not have been overly restrictive as such. The car kicked into a much higher fuel consumption band as well. I can't drive it on the street like that though, its toooo loud!
 
I guess by removing the exhausts you have increased the velocity thus torque... When I get time, I'll remove the 2 center mufflers and see if it makes a nice sound.. I dont want noise or drone... looking for a nice purr...
 


Top